Overhead and Profit in Roofing Supplements: Understanding When They Apply

Overhead and Profit in Roofing Supplements: Understanding When They Apply

In the roofing and restoration industry, the concept of Overhead and Profit (O&P) is critical for contractors to cover the true costs of doing business. When working with insurance claims, it's essential for contractors to include O&P in their supplements to ensure they are compensated fairly for their work. However, insurance carriers often attempt to challenge or eliminate these charges, creating significant issues for contractors. In this article, we’ll discuss what O&P is, when it should apply, and why the pushback from carriers can be seen as an unfair practice.

What Are Overhead and Profit?

Overhead and Profit are standard parts of a contractor’s pricing structure:

• Overhead (10%): Covers general business expenses such as office rent, utilities, administrative staff, insurance, licenses, and equipment. These costs are necessary to run a business, regardless of the specific project.
• Profit (10%): Represents the contractor’s earnings after all expenses are paid. This margin allows contractors to sustain their business and invest in growth, training, and future projects.

Typically, O&P is calculated as a combined 20% added to the cost of a project, reflecting the real expenses that ensure the contractor remains viable.

When Should Overhead and Profit Apply?

According to industry standards, O&P should be applied in cases where:

1. The project is complex or involves multiple trades: A job that requires coordination between different types of work, such as roofing, framing, HVAC, and electrical, justifies O&P. Managing these projects requires significant oversight and logistical expertise.
2. The project meets the definition of general contracting: When a contractor takes on the role of a general contractor who oversees various subcontractors, O&P is warranted.
3. The project scope involves non-standard or highly detailed work: If a roof repair includes specialized items or custom fabrications that require extra planning and skill, the O&P reflects these added demands.

Xactimate, the widely used estimating software for insurance claims, includes built-in functions to add O&P whenever it is applicable. This standard recognizes that contractors should be compensated for their business operations and the expertise needed to manage complex projects.

When Might Insurance Carriers Argue Against O&P?

Many insurance carriers try to argue that O&P should not be applied, often citing reasons like:

• Single-trade jobs: Carriers often claim that if only one trade (e.g., roofing) is involved, then O&P is not necessary. This argument can be misleading, as even single-trade roofing jobs can involve substantial oversight and non-routine work.
• Small projects: Carriers may say that if a project does not reach a certain monetary threshold, O&P should not be included. However, even smaller projects can require significant resources to manage, especially when unique challenges are present.

Why the Pushback from Carriers Is Unfair

Contractors rightfully feel that O&P should be included as part of their compensation, even for jobs that carriers try to exclude. Here’s why:

1. Operational Costs Don’t Disappear: Regardless of the project size, contractors still incur overhead costs, such as maintaining an office, paying administrative staff, insurance premiums, and equipment maintenance.
2. Skilled Oversight Is Essential: Even single-trade jobs like roofing often involve aspects that require project management skills, detailed planning, and precise execution. The notion that only multi-trade projects justify O&P overlooks the reality of what it takes to ensure a high-quality job.
3. Xactimate Allows It: If the estimating software—trusted and used by both contractors and insurance adjusters—permits O&P as a line item, it acknowledges that these expenses are valid and necessary. Carriers pushing to eliminate it are essentially attempting to undercut industry standards.

When Should O&P Not Apply?

While O&P is often justified, there are situations where it might not apply:

• Routine repairs that don’t require significant oversight: If the project is straightforward, with no need for coordination or specialized skills, the contractor may choose not to apply O&P.
• Minor jobs handled by a single crew without added resources: For simple jobs where oversight is minimal, the argument for O&P may not be as strong.

However, these exceptions do not cover a large portion of typical roofing projects. Most roof repairs or replacements involve various aspects that require careful management, making O&P a legitimate part of the project’s cost.

Conclusion

In summary, Overhead and Profit are essential elements of fair compensation for roofing contractors, reflecting the real costs of running a business and managing complex projects. While Xactimate allows for O&P to be included, insurance carriers often attempt to deny it, placing undue financial strain on contractors. It’s crucial for contractors to understand their rights and be prepared to justify the inclusion of O&P in their estimates. This practice helps maintain a healthy roofing industry where professionals can continue to deliver quality work without being unfairly penalized.

‍